Message boards : Questions and problems : About the Manager 7.16.3
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 2 Jan 18 Posts: 170 ![]() |
Just to inform, the manager still kill the running client (manually -./boinc- opened on another terminal) when you close with the red X (on Linux at least). That not happening when you close using the file tab. |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Jun 10 Posts: 2842 ![]() |
Just to inform, the manager still kill the running client (manually -./boinc- opened on another terminal) when you close with the red X (on Linux at least). If you enable the exit dialogue under options>other, then exit using File>Exit and ensure the stop running tasks isn't ticked, the next time you exit using the red X the client is not killed. (Ubuntu 19.04) at least on my system. |
Send message Joined: 2 Jan 18 Posts: 170 ![]() |
Just to inform, the manager still kill the running client (manually -./boinc- opened on another terminal) when you close with the red X (on Linux at least). I made that (several times, now & before) and no joy. When you hit the red X the manager stop but it stop the client (who runs in another terminal). I use Ubuntu 18.04 If i exit by File > Exit that's works fine (provided the stop running task is not checked of course). My point is simply and since that works on the old client, something was changed who make that stop working. Closing the manager with the red X on one terminal must not kill the client on the other one unless you specifically choose to do that. <edit>I see that you talk about, i will call it an "exit and restarting path" and works as a workaround of the problem (thanks for point me that) but the question remains: why we need to do that? Why that not working in the first try as worked for years on the old managers? |
Send message Joined: 5 Oct 06 Posts: 5149 ![]() |
... something was changed who make that stop working.Previously, clicking the X caused 'minimise to system tray'. Now that the system tray icon has been abolished on Linux builds, my guess is that the replacement pathway doesn't handle all scenarios cleanly. I'll try to take a look this afternoon. |
Copyright © 2025 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.